Header: Extension for a Changing Georgia: Delivering Excellence
Conducted by The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences
In cooperation with the College of Family and Consumer Sciences, Warnell School of Forest Resources, and UGA Public Service and Outreach
   

Progress Reports > Organizational Management and Development

COUNTY CLUSTERING

Since clustering was initiated in the mid-1990’s it has had its proponents and its detractors. When clustering was first implemented, it was sold to the counties on the basis that any time their agent spent working in another county would be matched by an agent in another county providing programming for them. Most districts even went so far as to develop a chart showing the exact percentages of time that each agent would spend in each county. Unfortunately, as we started losing positions to budget cuts and revisiting staffing patterns, the whole premise started to fall apart.

To the credit of our county faculty, clustering has worked in many places despite some of the challenges it presents. However, in some places it never worked well for a variety of reasons.

While we have not totally settled on how this will work, District Heads and PDC’s have generally come to consensus that the old clustering system needs revamped and we will probably do away with formal clusters and in fact stop using the term “cluster” altogether. A committee will be charged in the near future to study this issue and make recommendations to Extension Administration.

This concept fits well with one of our guiding principles of the Review of Extension Delivery which stated that we will not employ a “cookie cutter approach” to Extension programming.

UPDATE 12/16/05:

In September, 2005 the policy of specifically designated county clusters was abolished in Georgia Extension. Counties are still strongly encouraged to work together and collaborate on programs where it makes sense to do so. In fact all agents are expected to have in their plan of work at least one collaborative program or issue with other counties. These county groups will be called working groups or teams but will no longer be called clusters.

These teams of counties will not necessarily be the same for each program area. For instance one group of counties may work together on a 4-H issue and a Family & Consumer Science agent may work with an entirely different group of counties. The new structure will allow total flexibility for agents to determine what county working groups make sense for their particular program area.

 

Return to County Staffing

 
 

© 2004-2005 University of Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences
All rights reserved. Usage Policy.

 
  Site by CAES Web Team