Header: Extension for a Changing Georgia: Delivering Excellence
Conducted by The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences
In cooperation with the College of Family and Consumer Sciences, Warnell School of Forest Resources, and UGA Public Service and Outreach
   

Progress Reports > Urban Extension


GEORGIA URBAN INITIATIVE
Submitted by: Joan Marsh

The "Synopsis of Models for Improving Extension Program Delivery" document indicates the following options:

"Focus on all program areas developing programs for urban areas without super-imposing an organizational structure that would classify urban counties differently."

"Create an "urban initiative" with a state-level coordinator similar to the current program area coordinators and state staff from all the program areas focused on supporting agents and activities responding to urban issues and opportunities."

"Organize all the urban and densely suburbanized counties into one or more "urban district." If there is only one "urban district," those counties which are not geographically co-located (for example, Chatham, Richmond and Fulton) could be in the same CES district."

 

We will address Urban issues through an Urban Initiative and not a separate Urban District. The modeling teams identified the need for Extension to determine the most effective way to address increasing urbanization in Georgia. The options discussed basically revolved around (a) separate, but non-contiguous, district or, (b) programmatically. The reasons for this decision are several but include, (1) concern that the establishment of a “separate” urban district would have a polarizing effect on the organization i.e. why not a “rural” district or a “suburban” district, (2) belief that we can address changing demographics such as urbanization or increasing Hispanic population through program development and delivery without changing our organizational structure and, (3) the organizational structure should encourage interaction of programs.

A steering committee has been formed with support from administration. The committee has met several times to develop objectives and a structure for a Georgia Urban Initiative, focusing on program delivery methods and resources. The following plan has been approved by administration. A decision on a state level coordinator has been deferred to a later date due to budgets constraints.

 

To provide program delivery training and resources to agents in urban suburban counties.

 

  • Design and implement training programs focusing on volunteer development, collaboration, resource development, legislative outreach, technology and marketing

  • Establish a baseline for each county:
    • funding sources
    • personnel
    • volunteer programs
    • volunteer participation

  • Design and implement an annual conference

  • Designate an agent team responsible for conducting a site visit

 

Steering Committee:
Provides leadership, guidance and resources to the Working Group.

  • Joan Marsh
  • Bo Ryles
  • Mel Garber
  • Gil Landry
  • Tony Tyson
  • Jorge Atiles


Working Group:
Develops and implements strategies related to the objectives.

Committee Co-Chair Co-Chair Support
Resource Development Kim Siebert Peggy Bledsoe Joan Marsh
Volunteer Development Anthony Jones Cynthia Cochran Lori Purcell
Collaboration Susan Culpepper Marie Trice Sue Chapman*
Legislative Outreach Robert Brannen James Reaves Tony Tyson
Technology Willie Chance Todd Hurt Sheldon Hammond
Marketing Jackie Ogden Mandel Smith Faith Peppers

* and/or Northwest/Northeast PDS

 

Return to Progress Reports

 
 

© 2004-2005 University of Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences
All rights reserved. Usage Policy.

 
  Site by CAES Web Team